The move follows rumors that IPG was considering putting itself up for sale. It also follows a strategic review by Acxiom about the possibility of selling AMS and its LiveRamp division, an identity resolution service that specializes in matching offline and online data to create person-based profiles for targeting through its IdentityLink service.
In May, a report in AdExchanger indicated that Acxiom intended to sell AMS before selling LiveRamp and wasn’t considering bids for the entire company, because of the opportunity for a larger total price tag by splitting the company.
The Acxiom name will join IPG, which owns such major ad organizations as McCann Worldgroup, Deutsch and IPG Mediabrands. The AMS unit, which represents about three-quarters of the company’s total revenue, stores and manages anonymized consumer data from retailers, financial services and others.
As a major data provider, LiveRamp could bring a hefty price when it is offered as a standalone. Its IdentityLink forms the basis of the Advertising IQ Consortium, to which various data providers and ad tech firms belong.
There is speculation among observers that efforts to boost consumer data privacy — such as the recently launched General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for European Union consumers, the recently passed privacy law in California and the evolving Facebook scandal — could affect the viability of data providers. In March, giant social network Facebook announced it would no longer allow advertisers to import third-party data for ad targeting.
LiveRamp, acquired by Acxiom in 2014, promotes the idea that its data profiles of individuals, assembled by cross-matching various data sets and anonymized when used by advertisers, has had consent built in from the company’s beginning.
But it’s not clear if LiveRamp’s or AMS’s consent is, say, GDPR- or California-level consent, or whether huge swaths of it are now dependent on to-be-acquired consumer agreement.
“While Acxiom’s [AMS] data might seem lucrative,” customer data platform Segment CEO Peter Reinhardt told me via email, “what IPG needs to realize is that their data sets are likely not collected with explicit end user consent, which would violate data etiquette and could be in violation of new regulations.”
Urban Airship SVP Mike Herrick emailed me saying: “Acxiom has a treasure trove of third-party consumer data that will rapidly become difficult to collect, which is why it’s an attractive stop-gap investment for ad tech firms that have now found themselves cut out of the walled garden, first-party approaches taken by Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.”